Malay Mail | When questioned by defence lawyer Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad, the first prosecution witness in Muhyiddin Yassin’s corruption trial said he had not investigated if the two TikTok videos submitted as evidence had been posted by political cybertroopers. Muhyiddin’s legal team includes Joshua Tay and Lee Yee Woei.
Free Malaysia Today | The High Court in Muhyiddin Yassin’s corruption trial heard that two TikTok clips relied on by investigators had not been sent to the forensic department for verification, and had been edited. Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad, Joshua Tay, and Lee Yee Woei are among the lawyers who appeared for Muhyiddin.
Malay Mail | Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor failed in her last bid to recuse or remove the judge who found her guilty in her solar corruption case. The Court of Appeal can now proceed to hear her appeal against her conviction and sentence of 10 years’ jail and a RM970 million fine. Her lawyers included Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad and Lee Yee Woei.
AICHR | AICHR convened its 42nd Meeting on 24 to 27 February 2026 in Manila, chaired by Severo S. Catura, Representative of the Philippines to AICHR. Edmund Bon is Malaysia’s Representative to AICHR, and was the Chair of AICHR in 2025.
The Edge Malaysia | Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor’s case related to her solar graft appeal has been postponed again, as she was unable to attend court due to a fall. The matter will be heard on 3 March 2026 before the same panel. Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad and Lee Yee Woei were among the lawyers who appeared for Rosmah.
The Edge Malaysia | The prosecution is preparing the witness statement of former investment, trade and industry minister Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz in the case against ex-PM Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, who faces charges of abusing his position in connection with bribes and illicit activities. Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad and Lee Yee Woei appeared for Muhyiddin.
Just Security | The proposal by Edmund Bon, Representative of Malaysia to AICHR, for a more assertive AICHR with binding procedures reflects growing regional recognition of the limitations inherent in ASEAN’s non-binding, politically driven human rights framework. His call for legally binding regional instruments responds directly to the acknowledged absence of enforceable ASEAN agreements.
Harian Metro | Bekas Setiausaha Politik Kanan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin memohon supaya lima tuduhan rasuah yang dihadapinya dibicarakan di Mahkamah Tinggi kerana pertuduhan terhadapnya membabitkan persoalan undang-undang dan isu yang kompleks. Beliau diwakili peguam Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad dan Joshua Tay.
The Edge Malaysia | Datuk Seri Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin has applied to transfer his five graft charges from the Sessions Court to the High Court because his case involves complex constitutional and legal issues, and a High Court trial would allow appeals up to the Federal Court. He was represented by counsel Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad and Joshua Tay.
CNA | Lawyers and experts weigh in on why the number of court cases has shot up, and the implications for Malaysia’s justice system. Lawyer Edmund Bon believes that the rise sometimes means that justice served may be too rushed, with judges not having sufficient time to delve deeply into the cases and stakeholders being limited to succeeding or failing on only a few issues.
New Straits Times | The Federal Court declined to answer constitutional questions posed by former PM Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin in his sedition case, ruling that the issues could be dealt with by the KL High Court at trial. Muhyiddin can then still appeal to the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. His legal team includes Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad, Joshua Tay, and Lee Yee Woei.
Astro Awani | Mahkamah Persekutuan hari ini mengembalikan kes hasutan bekas Perdana Menteri Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin ke Mahkamah Tinggi untuk dibicarakan, selepas menolak untuk menjawab empat persoalan undang-undang yang dikemukakan pihak pembelaan. Pihak pembelaan Muhyiddin termasuk Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad, Joshua Tay, dan Lee Yee Woei.
The Edge Malaysia | The Federal Court declined to answer the four referral questions in Muhyiddin Yassin’s sedition case, and remitted the matter back to the High Court for trial. Muhyiddin’s lead counsel Amer Hamzah Arshad agreed not to proceed with the referral after consulting with Muhyiddin and the prosecution. The legal team includes Joshua Tay and Lee Yee Woei.
Malaysiakini | Muhyiddin Yassin’s legal team heeded the Federal Court’s advice to consider if the legal issues relating to the Sedition Act 1948 should be determined by the High Court, in order to preserve the avenues for appeal. The team, headed by Amer Hamzah Arshad, includes Joshua Tay and Lee Yee Woei.
Free Malaysia Today | The Federal Court remitted Muhyiddin Yassin’s sedition case for trial in the High Court after a five-member bench declined to answer the constitutional questions posed by the ex-PM, stating that the questions could be raised before the trial judge. Muhyiddin’s legal team includes Amer Hamzah Arshad, Joshua Tay, and Lee Yee Woei.
Malay Mail | The Federal Court ruled that the government has to meet higher standards before it can charge a Malaysian with “offensive” online remarks with the “intent to annoy” under section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act. Activist Heidy Quah’s lawyer New Sin Yew said that the Federal Court has now made clear that such action cannot be taken against political speeches.
Scoop | The Federal Court decided there was no basis to prosecute activist Heidy Quah under section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act, as her Facebook post did not amount to a communication that was “offensive with intent to annoy”, as the content was not offensive and the mens rea element of “intent to annoy” was absent. Quah’s legal team included lawyer New Sin Yew.
Free Malaysia Today | The Federal Court ruled that there was no basis to prosecute activist Heidy Quah on the grounds that a Facebook post she had made was “offensive” and communicated “with intent to annoy”, although those words under section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 were constitutional. Heidy Quah’s legal team included New Sin Yew.
Malaysiakini | The Federal Court has reinstated a provision in the Communications and Multimedia Act that criminalises content that “annoys” or is “offensive”. However, the court affirmed the Court of Appeal’s decision that activist Heidy Quah should not have been charged under the provision in September 2021 for her Facebook post. New Sin Yew, among others, represented Quah.
AICHR | The 5th Interface Meeting between AICHR and ACWC was chaired by Edmund Bon, AICHR Chair and Representative of Malaysia to AICHR. It continued AICHR and ACWC’s constructive cooperation on the promotion and protection of the rights of women and children in the region.
Malay Mail | When questioned by defence lawyer Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad, the first prosecution witness in Muhyiddin Yassin’s corruption trial said he had not investigated if the two TikTok videos submitted as evidence had been posted by political cybertroopers. Muhyiddin’s legal team includes Joshua Tay and Lee Yee Woei.
Free Malaysia Today | The High Court in Muhyiddin Yassin’s corruption trial heard that two TikTok clips relied on by investigators had not been sent to the forensic department for verification, and had been edited. Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad, Joshua Tay, and Lee Yee Woei are among the lawyers who appeared for Muhyiddin.
Malay Mail | Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor failed in her last bid to recuse or remove the judge who found her guilty in her solar corruption case. The Court of Appeal can now proceed to hear her appeal against her conviction and sentence of 10 years’ jail and a RM970 million fine. Her lawyers included Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad and Lee Yee Woei.
AICHR | AICHR convened its 42nd Meeting on 24 to 27 February 2026 in Manila, chaired by Severo S. Catura, Representative of the Philippines to AICHR. Edmund Bon is Malaysia’s Representative to AICHR, and was the Chair of AICHR in 2025.
The Edge Malaysia | Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor’s case related to her solar graft appeal has been postponed again, as she was unable to attend court due to a fall. The matter will be heard on 3 March 2026 before the same panel. Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad and Lee Yee Woei were among the lawyers who appeared for Rosmah.
The Edge Malaysia | The prosecution is preparing the witness statement of former investment, trade and industry minister Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz in the case against ex-PM Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, who faces charges of abusing his position in connection with bribes and illicit activities. Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad and Lee Yee Woei appeared for Muhyiddin.
Just Security | The proposal by Edmund Bon, Representative of Malaysia to AICHR, for a more assertive AICHR with binding procedures reflects growing regional recognition of the limitations inherent in ASEAN’s non-binding, politically driven human rights framework. His call for legally binding regional instruments responds directly to the acknowledged absence of enforceable ASEAN agreements.
Harian Metro | Bekas Setiausaha Politik Kanan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin memohon supaya lima tuduhan rasuah yang dihadapinya dibicarakan di Mahkamah Tinggi kerana pertuduhan terhadapnya membabitkan persoalan undang-undang dan isu yang kompleks. Beliau diwakili peguam Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad dan Joshua Tay.
The Edge Malaysia | Datuk Seri Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin has applied to transfer his five graft charges from the Sessions Court to the High Court because his case involves complex constitutional and legal issues, and a High Court trial would allow appeals up to the Federal Court. He was represented by counsel Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad and Joshua Tay.
CNA | Lawyers and experts weigh in on why the number of court cases has shot up, and the implications for Malaysia’s justice system. Lawyer Edmund Bon believes that the rise sometimes means that justice served may be too rushed, with judges not having sufficient time to delve deeply into the cases and stakeholders being limited to succeeding or failing on only a few issues.
New Straits Times | The Federal Court declined to answer constitutional questions posed by former PM Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin in his sedition case, ruling that the issues could be dealt with by the KL High Court at trial. Muhyiddin can then still appeal to the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. His legal team includes Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad, Joshua Tay, and Lee Yee Woei.
Astro Awani | Mahkamah Persekutuan hari ini mengembalikan kes hasutan bekas Perdana Menteri Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin ke Mahkamah Tinggi untuk dibicarakan, selepas menolak untuk menjawab empat persoalan undang-undang yang dikemukakan pihak pembelaan. Pihak pembelaan Muhyiddin termasuk Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad, Joshua Tay, dan Lee Yee Woei.
The Edge Malaysia | The Federal Court declined to answer the four referral questions in Muhyiddin Yassin’s sedition case, and remitted the matter back to the High Court for trial. Muhyiddin’s lead counsel Amer Hamzah Arshad agreed not to proceed with the referral after consulting with Muhyiddin and the prosecution. The legal team includes Joshua Tay and Lee Yee Woei.
Malaysiakini | Muhyiddin Yassin’s legal team heeded the Federal Court’s advice to consider if the legal issues relating to the Sedition Act 1948 should be determined by the High Court, in order to preserve the avenues for appeal. The team, headed by Amer Hamzah Arshad, includes Joshua Tay and Lee Yee Woei.
Free Malaysia Today | The Federal Court remitted Muhyiddin Yassin’s sedition case for trial in the High Court after a five-member bench declined to answer the constitutional questions posed by the ex-PM, stating that the questions could be raised before the trial judge. Muhyiddin’s legal team includes Amer Hamzah Arshad, Joshua Tay, and Lee Yee Woei.
Malay Mail | The Federal Court ruled that the government has to meet higher standards before it can charge a Malaysian with “offensive” online remarks with the “intent to annoy” under section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act. Activist Heidy Quah’s lawyer New Sin Yew said that the Federal Court has now made clear that such action cannot be taken against political speeches.
Scoop | The Federal Court decided there was no basis to prosecute activist Heidy Quah under section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act, as her Facebook post did not amount to a communication that was “offensive with intent to annoy”, as the content was not offensive and the mens rea element of “intent to annoy” was absent. Quah’s legal team included lawyer New Sin Yew.
Free Malaysia Today | The Federal Court ruled that there was no basis to prosecute activist Heidy Quah on the grounds that a Facebook post she had made was “offensive” and communicated “with intent to annoy”, although those words under section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 were constitutional. Heidy Quah’s legal team included New Sin Yew.
Malaysiakini | The Federal Court has reinstated a provision in the Communications and Multimedia Act that criminalises content that “annoys” or is “offensive”. However, the court affirmed the Court of Appeal’s decision that activist Heidy Quah should not have been charged under the provision in September 2021 for her Facebook post. New Sin Yew, among others, represented Quah.
AICHR | The 5th Interface Meeting between AICHR and ACWC was chaired by Edmund Bon, AICHR Chair and Representative of Malaysia to AICHR. It continued AICHR and ACWC’s constructive cooperation on the promotion and protection of the rights of women and children in the region.
