Section 233 of the CMA is a provision often used by successive governments to stifle dissent and criticism. Since the law is already bad, what do the government amendments attempt to do, and do they make it any better? New Sin Yew lays out the confusing circular logic in section 233 and urges the government to exclude the amendments to section 233 CMA from the current bill.
A stay of conviction should only be ordered in rare and exceptional cases.
We should be allowed to exercise our fundamental liberties and democratic rights while the state addresses public health concerns — they need not be mutually exclusive.
The minister said today in Parliament that the Emergency Ordinances had been revoked five days ago.
The government’s refusal or neglect to allow Parliament to vote on the Emergency frustrates the Parliament’s duty under Article 150(3) of the Federal Constitution.
While a person’s good name is of great value, so is the people’s freedom to challenge their government’s actions.
We must question. We must challenge. We must resist.
Our earlier research work.
Recounting the adrenaline-charged moment
Are statutory declarations reliable?
All extraneous evidence to support a Prime Minister candidate is unreliable.
Is Mahathir the 8th Prime Minister of Malaysia?
Missed opportunity to apply and expand Article 8(1) in the allocation of resources in parliamentary constituencies.
Objections should be premised upon human rights principles.
A decision by the Tribunal to remove the EC6 would affect their pensions and benefits.
The Tribunal should proceed.
Section 233 of the CMA is a provision often used by successive governments to stifle dissent and criticism. Since the law is already bad, what do the government amendments attempt to do, and do they make it any better? New Sin Yew lays out the confusing circular logic in section 233 and urges the government to exclude the amendments to section 233 CMA from the current bill.
A stay of conviction should only be ordered in rare and exceptional cases.
We should be allowed to exercise our fundamental liberties and democratic rights while the state addresses public health concerns — they need not be mutually exclusive.
The minister said today in Parliament that the Emergency Ordinances had been revoked five days ago.
The government’s refusal or neglect to allow Parliament to vote on the Emergency frustrates the Parliament’s duty under Article 150(3) of the Federal Constitution.
While a person’s good name is of great value, so is the people’s freedom to challenge their government’s actions.
We must question. We must challenge. We must resist.
Our earlier research work.
Recounting the adrenaline-charged moment
Are statutory declarations reliable?
All extraneous evidence to support a Prime Minister candidate is unreliable.
Is Mahathir the 8th Prime Minister of Malaysia?
Missed opportunity to apply and expand Article 8(1) in the allocation of resources in parliamentary constituencies.
Objections should be premised upon human rights principles.
A decision by the Tribunal to remove the EC6 would affect their pensions and benefits.
The Tribunal should proceed.
