Edmund Bon

Kes saman RM13.5 bilion Puncak Niaga terhadap Khalid Ibrahim dibicarakan

Harian Metro | Mahkamah Persekutuan memerintahkan kes saman RM13.5 bilion yang difailkan Puncak Niaga Holdings Bhd terhadap bekas MB Selangor Abdul Khalid Ibrahim dibicarakan di Mahkamah Tinggi Shah Alam. Hakim membuat keputusan itu selepas mendengar hujah peguam Gopal Sreenevasan yang mewakili Puncak Niaga manakala Edmund Bon Tai Soon mewakili Abdul Khalid.

Puncak Niaga’s RM13.5bil suit to go to trial – four years later

Free Malaysia Today | The Federal Court dismissed former Selangor MB Abdul Khalid Ibrahim and the Selangor government’s application for leave to appeal the Court of Appeal decision. The threshold of section 96 (on granting leave) under the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 has not been met as the High Court has not made a ruling. Edmund Bon represented Khalid.

Puncak Niaga’s RM14b suit against Khalid to go on trial

The Edge Markets | Counsel Edmund Bon, appearing with New Sin Yew and Michael Cheah, argued that the suit was time-barred; a claim for misfeasance must be filed within three years under the Public Authorities of Protection Act 1948. The Federal Court judge noted that the questions of law posed are of general importance and need to be properly ventilated in the trial.

Bersyukur dengan keputusan rayuan di Mahkamah Persekutuan

Facebook | Bekas MB Selangor Abdul Khalid Ibrahim merakamkan kesyukurannya terhadap keputusan rayuan di Mahkamah Persekutuan mengenai pemberian pampasan kepada pegawai-pegawai MBI Selangor. Mereka diwakili barisan peguam yang diketuai Edmund Bon dan New Sin Yew.

Amend laws so public can sue water polluters, urges lawyer

Free Malaysia Today | Human rights lawyer Edmund Bon said that existing legal provisions relied on the authorities to investigate and prosecute those suspected of water pollution. He called on the courts to allow greater legal standing room to NGOs and individuals for their cases to be heard in court.

MPs, senators allowed to intervene in Bersih’s suit against emergency proclamation

The Edge Markets | Bersih and six others, represented by Edmund Bon, had on Feb 2 posed four questions of law to be decided in the originating summons they filed to seek the court’s declaration on the roles of Parliament and the judiciary during Malaysia’s state of emergency. The High Court allowed five lawmakers to intervene in the legal challenge.

PKR, PAS leaders allowed to intervene in NGOs’ suit against PM

Malaysiakini | The PKR duo sought to back a suit by Bersih and other NGOs against PM Muhyiddin Yassin because they were presently unable to fulfil their duties in Parliament. The PAS trio contended that the legal action would hinder the government’s efforts to overcome the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia. Edmund Bon confirmed that his clients, the NGOs, raised no objection to the intervener bids.

PKR duo file bid to support NGOs’ legal challenge on emergency

Free Malaysia Today | Two PKR representatives filed an application to become interveners to support a suit by seven NGOs seeking a declaration on the role of Parliament and the judiciary during a state of emergency. They said the suspension of Parliament under the emergency had no effect under the Federal Constitution. Edmund Bon represented the NGOs.

PAS trio seek to oppose NGOs’ challenge over state of emergency in court

Free Malaysia Today | Three PAS representatives filed an application to oppose the suit by seven NGOs regarding the state of emergency. Representing the NGOs, lawyer Edmund Bon said his clients filed several legal questions for the Federal Court to determine, including whether the 1981 constitutional amendment to entirely oust the jurisdiction of the courts is unconstitutional.

Para tokoh ASEAN kecam kudeta militer di Myanmar

Sindonews.com | Para mantan Perwakilan Komisi Antar Pemerintah ASEAN untuk Hak Asasi Manusia (AICHR), termasuk Edmund Bon dari Malaysia, menyeru Myanmar supaya mematuhi Piagam ASEAN yang termasuk prinsip-prinsip demokrasi, pemerintahan yang baik, dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia.

Kes saman RM13.5 bilion Puncak Niaga terhadap Khalid Ibrahim dibicarakan

Harian Metro | Mahkamah Persekutuan memerintahkan kes saman RM13.5 bilion yang difailkan Puncak Niaga Holdings Bhd terhadap bekas MB Selangor Abdul Khalid Ibrahim dibicarakan di Mahkamah Tinggi Shah Alam. Hakim membuat keputusan itu selepas mendengar hujah peguam Gopal Sreenevasan yang mewakili Puncak Niaga manakala Edmund Bon Tai Soon mewakili Abdul Khalid.

Puncak Niaga’s RM13.5bil suit to go to trial – four years later

Free Malaysia Today | The Federal Court dismissed former Selangor MB Abdul Khalid Ibrahim and the Selangor government’s application for leave to appeal the Court of Appeal decision. The threshold of section 96 (on granting leave) under the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 has not been met as the High Court has not made a ruling. Edmund Bon represented Khalid.

Puncak Niaga’s RM14b suit against Khalid to go on trial

The Edge Markets | Counsel Edmund Bon, appearing with New Sin Yew and Michael Cheah, argued that the suit was time-barred; a claim for misfeasance must be filed within three years under the Public Authorities of Protection Act 1948. The Federal Court judge noted that the questions of law posed are of general importance and need to be properly ventilated in the trial.

Bersyukur dengan keputusan rayuan di Mahkamah Persekutuan

Facebook | Bekas MB Selangor Abdul Khalid Ibrahim merakamkan kesyukurannya terhadap keputusan rayuan di Mahkamah Persekutuan mengenai pemberian pampasan kepada pegawai-pegawai MBI Selangor. Mereka diwakili barisan peguam yang diketuai Edmund Bon dan New Sin Yew.

Amend laws so public can sue water polluters, urges lawyer

Free Malaysia Today | Human rights lawyer Edmund Bon said that existing legal provisions relied on the authorities to investigate and prosecute those suspected of water pollution. He called on the courts to allow greater legal standing room to NGOs and individuals for their cases to be heard in court.

MPs, senators allowed to intervene in Bersih’s suit against emergency proclamation

The Edge Markets | Bersih and six others, represented by Edmund Bon, had on Feb 2 posed four questions of law to be decided in the originating summons they filed to seek the court’s declaration on the roles of Parliament and the judiciary during Malaysia’s state of emergency. The High Court allowed five lawmakers to intervene in the legal challenge.

PKR, PAS leaders allowed to intervene in NGOs’ suit against PM

Malaysiakini | The PKR duo sought to back a suit by Bersih and other NGOs against PM Muhyiddin Yassin because they were presently unable to fulfil their duties in Parliament. The PAS trio contended that the legal action would hinder the government’s efforts to overcome the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia. Edmund Bon confirmed that his clients, the NGOs, raised no objection to the intervener bids.

PKR duo file bid to support NGOs’ legal challenge on emergency

Free Malaysia Today | Two PKR representatives filed an application to become interveners to support a suit by seven NGOs seeking a declaration on the role of Parliament and the judiciary during a state of emergency. They said the suspension of Parliament under the emergency had no effect under the Federal Constitution. Edmund Bon represented the NGOs.

PAS trio seek to oppose NGOs’ challenge over state of emergency in court

Free Malaysia Today | Three PAS representatives filed an application to oppose the suit by seven NGOs regarding the state of emergency. Representing the NGOs, lawyer Edmund Bon said his clients filed several legal questions for the Federal Court to determine, including whether the 1981 constitutional amendment to entirely oust the jurisdiction of the courts is unconstitutional.

Para tokoh ASEAN kecam kudeta militer di Myanmar

Sindonews.com | Para mantan Perwakilan Komisi Antar Pemerintah ASEAN untuk Hak Asasi Manusia (AICHR), termasuk Edmund Bon dari Malaysia, menyeru Myanmar supaya mematuhi Piagam ASEAN yang termasuk prinsip-prinsip demokrasi, pemerintahan yang baik, dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia.