Dayak Daily | Save Rivers chairman Peter Kallang pointed out that the suspension of Parliament was an extremely drastic measure. The NGOs believed that the government has enough powers to handle the COVID-19 crisis without the need to suspend the Parliament through the Emergency Ordinance, which overreached the Constitution and was disproportionate.
Malay Mail | Constitutional lawyer Edmund Bon said that this suit differed from others because it raises questions on the Emergency Ordinance which appears to circumvent constitutional safeguards by suspending the Parliament. This affects the work of groups fighting for reform such as Bersih 2.0 as they are unable to access and seek recourse at parliamentary sittings.
Malaysiakini | The Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance 2021 takes away elections in Malaysia indefinitely, suspends Parliament and State Legislatures, and gives the government wide powers to acquire private property, critiqued lawyer New Sin Yew. This is no democracy.
BFM | Article 150(1) of the Federal Constitution provides for a proclamation of emergency if security, economic life, or public order in the country is threatened. New Sin Yew mused that an emergency would not stop the spread of a pandemic; the coronavirus would not run away. He explained the suspension of Parliament, safeguards in Article 150(3), the role of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, and what dissatisfied citizens can do
Malaysiakini | Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin announced that Dewan Rakyat sittings are suspended during the emergency. According to constitutional lawyer New Sin Yew, this amounted to a disappearance of checks and balances on the actions of the government.
Free Malaysia Today | The High Court fixed 19 March to determine whether 39 individuals who professed the Ahmadiyya belief are Muslims by original faith or otherwise, which would decide whether the religious court had authority over them. In 2018, the High Court ruled that JAIS had no jurisdiction over the Ahmadiyya community. Lawyer Michael Cheah represented the individuals.
The Sun Daily | Lawyers Edmund Bon and New Sin Yew represented seven former staff of MBI Selangor in their appeal to the Federal Court. Edmund argued, because the MB was the sole legal entity under MBI Selangor, the MB did not need to seek approval from the board of directors for VSS payments made to the staff.
Free Malaysia Today | Edmund Bon argued that the claims against the former executives of MBI Selangor were misplaced. During a board meeting on Aug 25, 2014, it was agreed that VSS payments be made to the executives, and the board of directors merely acts in an advisory role to the MB as the chairman.
Malaysiakini | The High Court ruled that Article 63(1) of the Federal Constitution prevents the court from examining the validity of Parliament proceedings on the removal and appointment of the speaker and deputy speaker. Lawyer Amer Hamzah Arshad commended the court for a lengthy and clear judgment.
Free Malaysia Today | High Court judge Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid said the dispute over the appointment of speaker and deputy speaker became conclusive after the MPs had cast their votes. Amer Hamzah Arshad lauded the decision, noting that it clearly laid out the legal principles and should not be disputed.
The Edge Markets | Lawyers Amer Hamzah Arshad and Joshua Tay confirmed that Lembaga Tabung Haji ex-chairman Datuk Seri Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim has applied to strike out the charges against him. The grounds for the application was that the prosecution is mala fide, and that the charges are defective and groundless.
Free Malaysia Today | The Federal Court will hear on 6 January an appeal by former staff of then Selangor MB against an order to return the voluntary separation scheme compensation paid to them. Edmund Bon and Hoe Sue Lu represented the eight appellants in the case, the first of its kind, which will have implications for the MBI in five states.
BFM | Sunway Parking Services was ordered to pay RM117,000 in damages to a car rental company for the theft of a vehicle in its parking premises. Lawyer New Sin Yew offered his legal opinion on the liability of car park operators for car thefts, which depends on the relationship between the car owner and car park operator.
BFM | The Dewan Rakyat passed the second reading of the RM322.5 billion (US$79 billion) Budget 2021 yesterday, the largest budget ever tabled in Malaysia. New Sin Yew joined Emeritus Professor Datuk Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi to explain the policy and committee stages of the budget debate, and what would happen if the budget failed to be passed.
Reuters | The King was of the opinion that there was no need for an emergency in the country, calling foran end to politicking that could destabilise the administration. New Sin Yew, a constitutional lawyer, said that if the PM had formally advised the King to impose a state of emergency, in a constitutional monarchy, the monarch would have been obliged to comply.
Malaysiakini | Constitutional lawyer New Sin Yew noted that while the Agong must act in accordance with the government’s advice as required by Article 40 of the Federal Constitution, in reality, the government cannot ignore the influence and power of our Royal Institution when it comes to decision-making.
Malaysiakini | The government announced that COVID-19 patients would not be allowed to vote in the Sabah polls. Lawyer New Sin Yew said the government had no right to do so and should instead provide “reasonable assistance” for COVID-19 patients to vote. The right to vote is enshrined under Article 119(1) of the Federal Constitution.
Malay Mail | Five lawmakers filed an originating summons to challenge the appointment of Dewan Rakyat Speaker and Deputy Speaker. Amer Hamzah Arshad warned that a ruling against the respondents would open up an “unmitigated floodgate” of legal challenges against the rulings of the Speaker.
News Straits Times | Counsel Amer Hamzah Arshad argued that the Standing Orders of the Dewan Rakyat were made pursuant to Article 62(1) of the Federal Constitution which empowers the Parliament to regulate its own procedure. Hence, the Speaker and Deputy Speaker had acted within the confines of the power conferred on them. Amer was assisted by New Sin Yew, Hoe Sue Lu and Lee Yee Woei.
The Edge Markets | Counsel Amer Hamzah Arshad, representing the Dewan Rakyat Speaker and Deputy Speaker, said that the Court cannot look into the appointment of the Speaker due to the principle of the separation of powers protected under Article 63(1) of the Federal Constitution. Amer appeared with New Sin Yew and was assisted by Hoe Sue Lu and Lee Yee Woei.
Dayak Daily | Save Rivers chairman Peter Kallang pointed out that the suspension of Parliament was an extremely drastic measure. The NGOs believed that the government has enough powers to handle the COVID-19 crisis without the need to suspend the Parliament through the Emergency Ordinance, which overreached the Constitution and was disproportionate.
Malay Mail | Constitutional lawyer Edmund Bon said that this suit differed from others because it raises questions on the Emergency Ordinance which appears to circumvent constitutional safeguards by suspending the Parliament. This affects the work of groups fighting for reform such as Bersih 2.0 as they are unable to access and seek recourse at parliamentary sittings.
Malaysiakini | The Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance 2021 takes away elections in Malaysia indefinitely, suspends Parliament and State Legislatures, and gives the government wide powers to acquire private property, critiqued lawyer New Sin Yew. This is no democracy.
BFM | Article 150(1) of the Federal Constitution provides for a proclamation of emergency if security, economic life, or public order in the country is threatened. New Sin Yew mused that an emergency would not stop the spread of a pandemic; the coronavirus would not run away. He explained the suspension of Parliament, safeguards in Article 150(3), the role of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, and what dissatisfied citizens can do
Malaysiakini | Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin announced that Dewan Rakyat sittings are suspended during the emergency. According to constitutional lawyer New Sin Yew, this amounted to a disappearance of checks and balances on the actions of the government.
Free Malaysia Today | The High Court fixed 19 March to determine whether 39 individuals who professed the Ahmadiyya belief are Muslims by original faith or otherwise, which would decide whether the religious court had authority over them. In 2018, the High Court ruled that JAIS had no jurisdiction over the Ahmadiyya community. Lawyer Michael Cheah represented the individuals.
The Sun Daily | Lawyers Edmund Bon and New Sin Yew represented seven former staff of MBI Selangor in their appeal to the Federal Court. Edmund argued, because the MB was the sole legal entity under MBI Selangor, the MB did not need to seek approval from the board of directors for VSS payments made to the staff.
Free Malaysia Today | Edmund Bon argued that the claims against the former executives of MBI Selangor were misplaced. During a board meeting on Aug 25, 2014, it was agreed that VSS payments be made to the executives, and the board of directors merely acts in an advisory role to the MB as the chairman.
Malaysiakini | The High Court ruled that Article 63(1) of the Federal Constitution prevents the court from examining the validity of Parliament proceedings on the removal and appointment of the speaker and deputy speaker. Lawyer Amer Hamzah Arshad commended the court for a lengthy and clear judgment.
Free Malaysia Today | High Court judge Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid said the dispute over the appointment of speaker and deputy speaker became conclusive after the MPs had cast their votes. Amer Hamzah Arshad lauded the decision, noting that it clearly laid out the legal principles and should not be disputed.
The Edge Markets | Lawyers Amer Hamzah Arshad and Joshua Tay confirmed that Lembaga Tabung Haji ex-chairman Datuk Seri Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim has applied to strike out the charges against him. The grounds for the application was that the prosecution is mala fide, and that the charges are defective and groundless.
Free Malaysia Today | The Federal Court will hear on 6 January an appeal by former staff of then Selangor MB against an order to return the voluntary separation scheme compensation paid to them. Edmund Bon and Hoe Sue Lu represented the eight appellants in the case, the first of its kind, which will have implications for the MBI in five states.
BFM | Sunway Parking Services was ordered to pay RM117,000 in damages to a car rental company for the theft of a vehicle in its parking premises. Lawyer New Sin Yew offered his legal opinion on the liability of car park operators for car thefts, which depends on the relationship between the car owner and car park operator.
BFM | The Dewan Rakyat passed the second reading of the RM322.5 billion (US$79 billion) Budget 2021 yesterday, the largest budget ever tabled in Malaysia. New Sin Yew joined Emeritus Professor Datuk Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi to explain the policy and committee stages of the budget debate, and what would happen if the budget failed to be passed.
Reuters | The King was of the opinion that there was no need for an emergency in the country, calling foran end to politicking that could destabilise the administration. New Sin Yew, a constitutional lawyer, said that if the PM had formally advised the King to impose a state of emergency, in a constitutional monarchy, the monarch would have been obliged to comply.
Malaysiakini | Constitutional lawyer New Sin Yew noted that while the Agong must act in accordance with the government’s advice as required by Article 40 of the Federal Constitution, in reality, the government cannot ignore the influence and power of our Royal Institution when it comes to decision-making.
Malaysiakini | The government announced that COVID-19 patients would not be allowed to vote in the Sabah polls. Lawyer New Sin Yew said the government had no right to do so and should instead provide “reasonable assistance” for COVID-19 patients to vote. The right to vote is enshrined under Article 119(1) of the Federal Constitution.
Malay Mail | Five lawmakers filed an originating summons to challenge the appointment of Dewan Rakyat Speaker and Deputy Speaker. Amer Hamzah Arshad warned that a ruling against the respondents would open up an “unmitigated floodgate” of legal challenges against the rulings of the Speaker.
News Straits Times | Counsel Amer Hamzah Arshad argued that the Standing Orders of the Dewan Rakyat were made pursuant to Article 62(1) of the Federal Constitution which empowers the Parliament to regulate its own procedure. Hence, the Speaker and Deputy Speaker had acted within the confines of the power conferred on them. Amer was assisted by New Sin Yew, Hoe Sue Lu and Lee Yee Woei.
The Edge Markets | Counsel Amer Hamzah Arshad, representing the Dewan Rakyat Speaker and Deputy Speaker, said that the Court cannot look into the appointment of the Speaker due to the principle of the separation of powers protected under Article 63(1) of the Federal Constitution. Amer appeared with New Sin Yew and was assisted by Hoe Sue Lu and Lee Yee Woei.
