Free Malaysia Today | Following the Perak crisis in 2009 when three state assemblymen defected, the Federal Court ruled in 2010 that statutory declarations of elected representatives may be used to gauge support for a PM or state MB. Nevertheless, Edmund Bon, who was on the team of lawyers representing the ousted Perak MB, said a vote in Parliament is better as it will show clear support in numerical terms.
Focus Malaysia | Lawyers Bastian Pius Vendargon and Edmund Bon told FMT that a “floor test” would be the best option to determine whether the head of government retains the confidence of a majority of the elected representatives. But an UMNO Supreme Council member clalimed that PN will not agree to test PM Anwar’s majority in Parliament as it would expose the opposition coalition’s insufficient numbers.
Ateneo De Manila | The lecture series held at Chulalongkorn University looked back on the last 75 years of the UDHR and its historical, political, and cultural impact on the ASEAN member countries. Experts and dignitaries also discussed the prevailing human rights issues in the region.
Malay Mail | Legal experts sounded alarm against recent attempts by PN to topple the Anwar administration through defections, highlighting how the anti-party hopping law has not addressed defections. Lawyer New Sin Yew likened loopholes in the law to a doughnut with a hole in the middle – as long as the MPs stay with their party and don’t resign, even if they are sacked from their parties, they will
Malay Mail | Here’s a quick summary what happened with the book ban and why, based on the Court of Appeal’s majority and minority judgments released last month, and the High Court’s decision, as well as other documents. Lawyers Edmund Bon and Micheal Cheah are representing the book author and publisher.
The Edge Malaysia | Edmund Bon stressed that mandatory due diligence for labour, governance, and the environment must be implemented. Human rights due diligence should be made in to law. He urged companies to work on initiatives to protect human rights without waiting for the National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (NAPBHR).
Scoop | Lawyer Edmund Bon Tai Soon, acting for Gerakbudaya publisher Chong Ton Sin and author Ngeo Boon Lin, said 11 legal and constitutional questions had been filed to obtain leave from the Federal Court to hear the appeal to remove the book ban.
The Star | The application seeking leave to appeal to the Federal Court to remove a book ban imposed by the government, following a split majority ruling by the Court of Appeal, will be heard on Feb 28 next year, said lawyer Edmund Bon.
Free Malaysia Today | Lawyer Edmund Bon confirmed that an application with 11 legal and constitutional questions has been filed with the Federal Court to remove a book ban imposed by the government. Applicants must satisfy the court by framing novel legal and constitutional questions that are of public importance and raised for the first time, as required under section 96 of the Courts of Judicature Act.
Malaysiakini | The YDPA-in-waiting suggested for MACC and Petronas to report directly to the throne. Lawyer New Sin Yew opined that while the YDPA is entitled to information concerning the government as stipulated in Article 40(1) of the Federal Constitution, for government agencies to report directly to him is a different matter.
Free Malaysia Today | Lawyers appearing for the appellants argued for their clients to be acquitted as the ingredients of the charge were not proven beyond reasonable doubt. Amer Hamzah Arshad said his client could at best be convicted only for culpable homicide, abduction, and disposing of evidence. Justice Hadhariah Syed Ismail said the COA bench would deliver its ruling on March 14.
The Edge Malaysia | The lawyers representing the three men who are appealing against their guilty conviction of murdering the late DPP Anthony Kevin Morais implored the judges of the case to set aside their friendship with Morais in deciding on the men’s appeal. Amer Hamzah Arshad, representing S. Nimalan, said the bench has to put aside its sentiment regarding the deceased, and follow the law.
Malaysiakini | Counsel Amer Hamzah Arshad submitted multiple grounds to strike out of the charges against Rosmah Mansor. The 12 money laundering charges involving RM7.09mil are framed under section 4(1)(a) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act. The five tax evasion charges under section 77(1) of the Income Tax Act 1967 claim that Rosmah failed to declare her income for five years.
New Malaysia Herald | Defence counsel Amer Hamzah Arshad presented legal issues pertaining to the AMLA charges and reasons why they should be struck out and Rosmah Mansor should be acquitted. Amer said the MACC had acted ultra vires and the defects in the charges are incurable while the first to 12th charges failed to state the predicate offence.
Free Malaysia Today | Rosmah Mansor, wife of former PM Najib Razak, is standing trial on 12 money laundering charges involving RM7.09 million and five charges of failing to declare her income to the IRB. In an application to strike out the charges, lawyer Amer Hamzah Arshad said there were missing links and 12 of the charges did not involve a “transaction” as defined by law.
CodeBlue | The deregulation of liquid nicotine contravenes the right to health which falls fall under the right to life. Citing international conventions ratified by Malaysia, Edmund Bon submitted in court, “I’m inviting, my Lord, to extend the definition of Article 5 [of the Federal Constitution] for the first time to include the right to health as a right that is logically an integral part of life itself.”
The Edge Malaysia | Amer Hamzah Arshad argued that the conviction of his client for murder by the High Court was unsafe as his client’s role in the case was only to show where the barrel containing DPP Kevin Morais’ body was disposed of. Amer added that his client can at best be faced with section 365 (for kidnapping) or 201 (hiding of evidence) under the Penal Code.
Free Malaysia Today | The prosecution failed to establish a common intention among six accused persons to murder DPP Kevin Morais eight years ago despite turning a seventh accused into a material witness, submitted defence lawyers. Amer Hamzah Arshad acted for S. Nimalan, one of the six accused persons.
New Straits Times | Counsel Amer Hamzah Arshad, who appeared for S. Nimalan, questioned, “If there is no identifiable action, let alone any evidence of the appellant’s actions, how can it be said that the asphyxiation suffered by the deceased was intentional or unintentional?” No other evidence indicated that the appellant intended to incapacitate or suffocate the deceased.
Scoop | The high court here today was told that with the passing of the smoking control bill last week, vendors cannot sell smoking products to minors. Three NGOs, represented by counsel Edmund Bon, have filed a judicial review application to quash part of the Poisons (Amendment of Poison List) Order made by the Health Ministry and to seek a declaration that the impugned order is void.
Free Malaysia Today | Following the Perak crisis in 2009 when three state assemblymen defected, the Federal Court ruled in 2010 that statutory declarations of elected representatives may be used to gauge support for a PM or state MB. Nevertheless, Edmund Bon, who was on the team of lawyers representing the ousted Perak MB, said a vote in Parliament is better as it will show clear support in numerical terms.
Focus Malaysia | Lawyers Bastian Pius Vendargon and Edmund Bon told FMT that a “floor test” would be the best option to determine whether the head of government retains the confidence of a majority of the elected representatives. But an UMNO Supreme Council member clalimed that PN will not agree to test PM Anwar’s majority in Parliament as it would expose the opposition coalition’s insufficient numbers.
Ateneo De Manila | The lecture series held at Chulalongkorn University looked back on the last 75 years of the UDHR and its historical, political, and cultural impact on the ASEAN member countries. Experts and dignitaries also discussed the prevailing human rights issues in the region.
Malay Mail | Legal experts sounded alarm against recent attempts by PN to topple the Anwar administration through defections, highlighting how the anti-party hopping law has not addressed defections. Lawyer New Sin Yew likened loopholes in the law to a doughnut with a hole in the middle – as long as the MPs stay with their party and don’t resign, even if they are sacked from their parties, they will
Malay Mail | Here’s a quick summary what happened with the book ban and why, based on the Court of Appeal’s majority and minority judgments released last month, and the High Court’s decision, as well as other documents. Lawyers Edmund Bon and Micheal Cheah are representing the book author and publisher.
The Edge Malaysia | Edmund Bon stressed that mandatory due diligence for labour, governance, and the environment must be implemented. Human rights due diligence should be made in to law. He urged companies to work on initiatives to protect human rights without waiting for the National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (NAPBHR).
Scoop | Lawyer Edmund Bon Tai Soon, acting for Gerakbudaya publisher Chong Ton Sin and author Ngeo Boon Lin, said 11 legal and constitutional questions had been filed to obtain leave from the Federal Court to hear the appeal to remove the book ban.
The Star | The application seeking leave to appeal to the Federal Court to remove a book ban imposed by the government, following a split majority ruling by the Court of Appeal, will be heard on Feb 28 next year, said lawyer Edmund Bon.
Free Malaysia Today | Lawyer Edmund Bon confirmed that an application with 11 legal and constitutional questions has been filed with the Federal Court to remove a book ban imposed by the government. Applicants must satisfy the court by framing novel legal and constitutional questions that are of public importance and raised for the first time, as required under section 96 of the Courts of Judicature Act.
Malaysiakini | The YDPA-in-waiting suggested for MACC and Petronas to report directly to the throne. Lawyer New Sin Yew opined that while the YDPA is entitled to information concerning the government as stipulated in Article 40(1) of the Federal Constitution, for government agencies to report directly to him is a different matter.
Free Malaysia Today | Lawyers appearing for the appellants argued for their clients to be acquitted as the ingredients of the charge were not proven beyond reasonable doubt. Amer Hamzah Arshad said his client could at best be convicted only for culpable homicide, abduction, and disposing of evidence. Justice Hadhariah Syed Ismail said the COA bench would deliver its ruling on March 14.
The Edge Malaysia | The lawyers representing the three men who are appealing against their guilty conviction of murdering the late DPP Anthony Kevin Morais implored the judges of the case to set aside their friendship with Morais in deciding on the men’s appeal. Amer Hamzah Arshad, representing S. Nimalan, said the bench has to put aside its sentiment regarding the deceased, and follow the law.
Malaysiakini | Counsel Amer Hamzah Arshad submitted multiple grounds to strike out of the charges against Rosmah Mansor. The 12 money laundering charges involving RM7.09mil are framed under section 4(1)(a) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act. The five tax evasion charges under section 77(1) of the Income Tax Act 1967 claim that Rosmah failed to declare her income for five years.
New Malaysia Herald | Defence counsel Amer Hamzah Arshad presented legal issues pertaining to the AMLA charges and reasons why they should be struck out and Rosmah Mansor should be acquitted. Amer said the MACC had acted ultra vires and the defects in the charges are incurable while the first to 12th charges failed to state the predicate offence.
Free Malaysia Today | Rosmah Mansor, wife of former PM Najib Razak, is standing trial on 12 money laundering charges involving RM7.09 million and five charges of failing to declare her income to the IRB. In an application to strike out the charges, lawyer Amer Hamzah Arshad said there were missing links and 12 of the charges did not involve a “transaction” as defined by law.
CodeBlue | The deregulation of liquid nicotine contravenes the right to health which falls fall under the right to life. Citing international conventions ratified by Malaysia, Edmund Bon submitted in court, “I’m inviting, my Lord, to extend the definition of Article 5 [of the Federal Constitution] for the first time to include the right to health as a right that is logically an integral part of life itself.”
The Edge Malaysia | Amer Hamzah Arshad argued that the conviction of his client for murder by the High Court was unsafe as his client’s role in the case was only to show where the barrel containing DPP Kevin Morais’ body was disposed of. Amer added that his client can at best be faced with section 365 (for kidnapping) or 201 (hiding of evidence) under the Penal Code.
Free Malaysia Today | The prosecution failed to establish a common intention among six accused persons to murder DPP Kevin Morais eight years ago despite turning a seventh accused into a material witness, submitted defence lawyers. Amer Hamzah Arshad acted for S. Nimalan, one of the six accused persons.
New Straits Times | Counsel Amer Hamzah Arshad, who appeared for S. Nimalan, questioned, “If there is no identifiable action, let alone any evidence of the appellant’s actions, how can it be said that the asphyxiation suffered by the deceased was intentional or unintentional?” No other evidence indicated that the appellant intended to incapacitate or suffocate the deceased.
Scoop | The high court here today was told that with the passing of the smoking control bill last week, vendors cannot sell smoking products to minors. Three NGOs, represented by counsel Edmund Bon, have filed a judicial review application to quash part of the Poisons (Amendment of Poison List) Order made by the Health Ministry and to seek a declaration that the impugned order is void.
