Puncak Niaga

Puncak Niaga pursuing RM13.5bil suit against ex-MB, state govt, says lawyer

Free Malaysia Today | Puncak Niaga’s suit will still be pursued four years after being filed. Edmund Bon, representing former Selangor MB Abdul Khalid Ibrahim, had submitted that the suit was time-barred, but the Federal Court ruled that this needed to be properly ventilated during trial. Michael Cheah explained that this suit was delayed awaiting the outcome of a Federal Court ruling on abuse of power in public office, involving former PM Najib Razak.

Kes saman RM13.5 bilion Puncak Niaga terhadap Khalid Ibrahim dibicarakan

Harian Metro | Mahkamah Persekutuan memerintahkan kes saman RM13.5 bilion yang difailkan Puncak Niaga Holdings Bhd terhadap bekas MB Selangor Abdul Khalid Ibrahim dibicarakan di Mahkamah Tinggi Shah Alam. Hakim membuat keputusan itu selepas mendengar hujah peguam Gopal Sreenevasan yang mewakili Puncak Niaga manakala Edmund Bon Tai Soon mewakili Abdul Khalid.

Puncak Niaga’s RM13.5bil suit to go to trial – four years later

Free Malaysia Today | The Federal Court dismissed former Selangor MB Abdul Khalid Ibrahim and the Selangor government’s application for leave to appeal the Court of Appeal decision. The threshold of section 96 (on granting leave) under the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 has not been met as the High Court has not made a ruling. Edmund Bon represented Khalid.

Puncak Niaga’s RM14b suit against Khalid to go on trial

The Edge Markets | Counsel Edmund Bon, appearing with New Sin Yew and Michael Cheah, argued that the suit was time-barred; a claim for misfeasance must be filed within three years under the Public Authorities of Protection Act 1948. The Federal Court judge noted that the questions of law posed are of general importance and need to be properly ventilated in the trial.

Saman RM13.5 bilion Puncak Niaga terhadap Abdul Khalid dibicara di Mahkamah Tinggi

Utusan Malaysia | Mahkamah Rayuan membenarkan rayuan Puncak Niaga terhadap bekas MB Selangor Abdul Khalid Ibrahim. Mahkamah berpendapat isu berhubung sekatan di bawah Akta Perlindungan Pihak Berkuasa Awam (PAPA) 1948 perlu ditentukan menerusi perbicaraan kerana ia melibatkan persoalan undang-undang yang penting. Edmund Bon mewakili Abdul Khalid.

Keputusan batal saman Puncak Niaga Februari

Sinar Harian | Mahkamah Tinggi menetapkan 22 Februari depan untuk keputusan permohonan Kerajaan Negeri dan bekas MB Selangor Abdul Khalid Ibrahim untuk membatalkan saman RM14 bilion daripada Puncak Niaga Holdings Berhad. New Sin Yew mewakili Khalid selaku defendan pertama.

Puncak Niaga pursuing RM13.5bil suit against ex-MB, state govt, says lawyer

Free Malaysia Today | Puncak Niaga’s suit will still be pursued four years after being filed. Edmund Bon, representing former Selangor MB Abdul Khalid Ibrahim, had submitted that the suit was time-barred, but the Federal Court ruled that this needed to be properly ventilated during trial. Michael Cheah explained that this suit was delayed awaiting the outcome of a Federal Court ruling on abuse of power in public office, involving former PM Najib Razak.

Kes saman RM13.5 bilion Puncak Niaga terhadap Khalid Ibrahim dibicarakan

Harian Metro | Mahkamah Persekutuan memerintahkan kes saman RM13.5 bilion yang difailkan Puncak Niaga Holdings Bhd terhadap bekas MB Selangor Abdul Khalid Ibrahim dibicarakan di Mahkamah Tinggi Shah Alam. Hakim membuat keputusan itu selepas mendengar hujah peguam Gopal Sreenevasan yang mewakili Puncak Niaga manakala Edmund Bon Tai Soon mewakili Abdul Khalid.

Puncak Niaga’s RM13.5bil suit to go to trial – four years later

Free Malaysia Today | The Federal Court dismissed former Selangor MB Abdul Khalid Ibrahim and the Selangor government’s application for leave to appeal the Court of Appeal decision. The threshold of section 96 (on granting leave) under the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 has not been met as the High Court has not made a ruling. Edmund Bon represented Khalid.

Puncak Niaga’s RM14b suit against Khalid to go on trial

The Edge Markets | Counsel Edmund Bon, appearing with New Sin Yew and Michael Cheah, argued that the suit was time-barred; a claim for misfeasance must be filed within three years under the Public Authorities of Protection Act 1948. The Federal Court judge noted that the questions of law posed are of general importance and need to be properly ventilated in the trial.

Saman RM13.5 bilion Puncak Niaga terhadap Abdul Khalid dibicara di Mahkamah Tinggi

Utusan Malaysia | Mahkamah Rayuan membenarkan rayuan Puncak Niaga terhadap bekas MB Selangor Abdul Khalid Ibrahim. Mahkamah berpendapat isu berhubung sekatan di bawah Akta Perlindungan Pihak Berkuasa Awam (PAPA) 1948 perlu ditentukan menerusi perbicaraan kerana ia melibatkan persoalan undang-undang yang penting. Edmund Bon mewakili Abdul Khalid.

Keputusan batal saman Puncak Niaga Februari

Sinar Harian | Mahkamah Tinggi menetapkan 22 Februari depan untuk keputusan permohonan Kerajaan Negeri dan bekas MB Selangor Abdul Khalid Ibrahim untuk membatalkan saman RM14 bilion daripada Puncak Niaga Holdings Berhad. New Sin Yew mewakili Khalid selaku defendan pertama.